On Jan 25, 4:10 pm, Laurent PETIT <[email protected]> wrote: > #- makes sense (CL didn't always make things the wrong way :-) > > And indeed, #; *could* break a lot of already existing editors for a while > Yes, the issues are: #; is bad for editors #- would be incompatible with CL's #-, and couldn't be upgraded to compatibility without breakage. I'm not sure the latter is a big deal, as #-test ... in CL is just an alternative for #+(not test) ... Rich --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- Support for disabling forms (reader macro similar to C... Jan Rychter
- Re: Support for disabling forms (reader macro sim... Zak Wilson
- Re: Support for disabling forms (reader macro... Meikel Brandmeyer
- Re: Support for disabling forms (reader m... Jan Rychter
- Re: Support for disabling forms (read... Rich Hickey
- Re: Support for disabling forms ... Mark Volkmann
- Re: Support for disabling fo... Jan Rychter
- Re: Support for disabling fo... Jan Rychter
- Re: Support for disablin... Laurent PETIT
- Re: Support for disablin... Rich Hickey
- Re: Support for disablin... Cosmin Stejerean
- Re: Support for disablin... Rich Hickey
- Re: Support for disablin... Cosmin Stejerean
- Re: Support for disablin... Jan Rychter
- Re: Support for disablin... Jan Rychter
- Re: Support for disablin... Rich Hickey
- Re: Support for disablin... Jan Rychter
- Re: Support for disablin... James G. Sack (jim)
