On Jan 26, 11:15 am, Cosmin Stejerean <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Rich Hickey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 25, 4:10 pm, Laurent PETIT <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > #- makes sense (CL didn't always make things the wrong way :-)
>
> > > And indeed, #; *could* break a lot of already existing editors for a
> > while
>
> > Yes, the issues are:
>
> > #; is bad for editors
>
> > #- would be incompatible with CL's #-, and couldn't be upgraded to
> > compatibility without breakage.
>
> > I'm not sure the latter is a big deal, as #-test ... in CL is just an
> > alternative for #+(not test) ...
>
> Is ## an option?
>
How about #_ ?
Rich
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
