Rich Hickey wrote: > > > On Jan 25, 4:10 pm, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: >> #- makes sense (CL didn't always make things the wrong way :-) >> >> And indeed, #; *could* break a lot of already existing editors for a while >> > > Yes, the issues are: > > #; is bad for editors > > #- would be incompatible with CL's #-, and couldn't be upgraded to > compatibility without breakage. > > I'm not sure the latter is a big deal, as #-test ... in CL is just an > alternative for #+(not test) ...
Has anyone suggested ## Regards, ..jim --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
