Following up on my own post: Jan Rychter <j...@rychter.com> writes: > Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Jan 26, 11:15 am, Cosmin Stejerean <cstejer...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > On Jan 25, 4:10 pm, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > #- makes sense (CL didn't always make things the wrong way :-) >>> > > And indeed, #; *could* break a lot of already existing editors for a >>> > > while >>> > Yes, the issues are: >>> >>> > #; is bad for editors >>> >>> > #- would be incompatible with CL's #-, and couldn't be upgraded to >>> > compatibility without breakage. >>> >>> > I'm not sure the latter is a big deal, as #-test ... in CL is just an >>> > alternative for #+(not test) ... >>> >>> Is ## an option? >>> >> How about #_ ? > > I would prefer #-, but if you think you might want to have a reader > conditional system similar to CL in the future, #_ is fine as well. > > Actually, any character is better than plucking out multi-line forms and > commenting them out :-) > > --J.
Any chance this could get implemented, Rich? I really miss that functionality when developing with Clojure. --J. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
