Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> writes: > On Jan 26, 11:15 am, Cosmin Stejerean <cstejer...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Jan 25, 4:10 pm, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > #- makes sense (CL didn't always make things the wrong way :-) >> >> > > And indeed, #; *could* break a lot of already existing editors for a >> > while >> >> > Yes, the issues are: >> >> > #; is bad for editors >> >> > #- would be incompatible with CL's #-, and couldn't be upgraded to >> > compatibility without breakage. >> >> > I'm not sure the latter is a big deal, as #-test ... in CL is just an >> > alternative for #+(not test) ... >> >> Is ## an option? >> > How about #_ ?
I would prefer #-, but if you think you might want to have a reader conditional system similar to CL in the future, #_ is fine as well. Actually, any character is better than plucking out multi-line forms and commenting them out :-) --J. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
