On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Jan 26, 11:15 am, Cosmin Stejerean <cstejer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > On Jan 25, 4:10 pm, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > #- makes sense (CL didn't always make things the wrong way :-) > > > > > > And indeed, #; *could* break a lot of already existing editors for a > > > while > > > > > Yes, the issues are: > > > > > #; is bad for editors > > > > > #- would be incompatible with CL's #-, and couldn't be upgraded to > > > compatibility without breakage. > > > > > I'm not sure the latter is a big deal, as #-test ... in CL is just an > > > alternative for #+(not test) ... > > > > Is ## an option? > > > > How about #_ ? > > Rich > I don't see anything wrong with #_. -- Cosmin Stejerean http://offbytwo.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
