2010/7/8 Steven E. Harris <s...@panix.com>
> Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > But to make it really clear: move-past-close-and-reindent is exactly
> > what counterclockwise's is doing in "Strict" edition mode (not totally
> > true concerning the reindentation, currently in ccw it is only
> > reorganizing closing brackets by removing extra spaces, not
> > reindenting lines).
>
> I see. That's good to hear.
>
> It's hard to know when you've really met the Emacs capability
> there. That function does so many things right that I can't bear editing
> Lisp code without it. That it's hard to adapt it to work with symmetric
> brackets (for Clojure's '[' and ']') is disappointing, and I have found
> the paredit package to be not much better on that front (having
> difficulty with balancing '{' and '}'). It has its own set of oddities.
>
>
When you say "that it's hard ... '[' and ']' ...", you're talking about the
original paredit.el in emacs ? Or you saw a deficiency in counterclockwise ?
'cause in ccw this works equally well for ], } and ) ( it even allows you
to jump out of a ] even if the cursor is deep inside nested (({{(
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
