On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:32 PM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Mike Meyer > <mwm-keyword-googlegroups.620...@mired.org> wrote: >> >> Clojure great. No questions about that. WAR files, CLASSPATHs, having >> to wrap *every little command* in it's own script - that's what I'm >> looking at. > > I've already shown that you don't need WAR files. If you really, really hate > the CLASSPATH you should look at cake. It does require ruby, but it let's > you essentially write "instant-on" Clojure shell scripts as well as give you > access to things like the working shell directory if that's the way you want > to work with Clojure. > #!/usr/bin/env cake run > (println "Hello world!") > Other people have felt your pain and have started building solutions. You > can help them out by using those solutions and giving feedback :)
Woah. I knew cake did some funky build stuff, but I didn't realize you could make use of it's "global project" like that. The global project seems to amount to something like Python's site-packages or Ruby's gems, right? Just a repo of installed packages for the system? What's the reason that this couldn't be done directly in clojure? (probably not the best place to start this conversation of course) -- http://www.apgwoz.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
