I didn't mean to imply that other people don't have the "ah-hah!" experience with other languages. However, I have only had the (before lisp)|(after lisp) experience with lisp.
Your enlightenment might vary. Rich gave his "Whitehead" talk and brought up the fact that OO languages get several things wrong. I watched that with a Java programmer and he was not able to understand the points Rich was making. He just saw it in terms of "value" objects, "function" objects, "identity" objects, and "state" objects. Sort of, "I've got an object hammer so everything is an object nail" approach. Tim Daly -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
