On Sep 10, 9:31 pm, Sean Corfield <seancorfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Jan Rychter <jrych...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If you use Clojure to build an application that you subsequently
> > launch and maintain, it is pretty much a given that you use contrib.
> > Lots of it, in fact.
>
> I think that depends on when you started building stuff with Clojure.
> I get the impression quite a bit of old contrib grew up to provide
> functionality not in Clojure's core and I see quite a few pieces of
> old contrib that are explicitly deprecated because functions moved to
> Clojure 1.2 (c.c.string, for example, mostly moved to clojure.string
> long before Clojure 1.3 got under way). I suspect that folks who
> started with Clojure long ago and are relying heavily on old contrib,
> are probably relying on those old deprecated namespaces and functions
> and have simply avoided updating their code to use the newer,
> supported namespaces. I think the break in contrib coming with 1.3
> will be good for the Clojure ecosystem overall because it will force a
> lot of folks to clean up their code :)

Just to clarify, I am not against change, quite the opposite — I'd
much rather see a quickly evolving Clojure ecosystem than one mired in
legacy code. I will gladly rework my code regularly so that it works
with newer releases. I'd just like to see the process somewhat
documented.

I think I've said all there was to be said in this discussion, so I'll
shut up now and wait for better documentation or a migration guide. In
the meantime, we'll stick to Clojure 1.2 together with our patched-up
monolithic contrib.

thanks,
--J.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to