On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Sean Corfield <seancorfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Cedric Greevey <cgree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Michael Fogus <mefo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Google also helps too. :-)
>> Not really, not with a single fairly generic word like "unification".
>
> #1 result: wikipedia, which has a disambiguation page with the second entry:
>
> "Unification (computer science), the act of identifying two terms with
> a suitable substitution"
>
> That page in turn says:
>
> "Unification, in computer science and logic, is an algorithmic process
> by which one attempts to solve the satisfiability problem. The goal of
> unification is to find a substitution which demonstrates that two
> seemingly different terms are in fact either identical or just equal...

In other words, a particular one out of ten links, followed by some
other link, followed by a particular one out of some *more* links,
leads to something abstruse and theoretical that *still* has no
immediately obvious implications for any real-world programming
project other than, possibly, a compiler's optimizer or type inference
system.

And meanwhile there's nothing in what you wrote to eliminate the
possibility that other chains of links from the Google search wouldn't
lead to other plausibly-relevant subject matters. Such as the
standard-setting efforts and suchlike.

:)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to