On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Michael Fogus <mefo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Not really, not with a single fairly generic word like "unification".
>
> In the amount of time that you spent lecturing me on good library
> release note practices you could have learned what unification was,
> read the code, and decided if it filled any of your needs.

Perhaps, given mind-reading powers and one or two other unusual
capabilities, I might have been able to do so, yes. :)

> Hint.  My library has very little if nothing to do with Star Trek.

Talk about completely missing the point. I think I was pretty clear
myself that that was the case; I was just indicating that the Google
search would produce a thicket of results in which it would be
difficult to find one that actually could definitely enlighten as to
what your library was all about, *both* due to the amount of
obviously-irrelevant clutter in said results *and* because there'd be
multiple plausibly-relevant but dissimilar candidates after said
clutter was mentally weeded out.

The search query would need to be narrower than just the word
"unification", in other words.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to