On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Michael Fogus <mefo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Not really, not with a single fairly generic word like "unification". > > In the amount of time that you spent lecturing me on good library > release note practices you could have learned what unification was, > read the code, and decided if it filled any of your needs.
Perhaps, given mind-reading powers and one or two other unusual capabilities, I might have been able to do so, yes. :) > Hint. My library has very little if nothing to do with Star Trek. Talk about completely missing the point. I think I was pretty clear myself that that was the case; I was just indicating that the Google search would produce a thicket of results in which it would be difficult to find one that actually could definitely enlighten as to what your library was all about, *both* due to the amount of obviously-irrelevant clutter in said results *and* because there'd be multiple plausibly-relevant but dissimilar candidates after said clutter was mentally weeded out. The search query would need to be narrower than just the word "unification", in other words. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
