I've tried paredit several times and dislike it. I found that while editing the code, I spent a lot of mental energy trying to figure out how to edit the code within the constraints of the structure-preserving transformation key combos, which took away from my ability to concentrate on the problem at hand. I know plenty of others who feel the same way. So maybe the paredit folks are just a "vocal minority". Do you have any evidence for your claim that paredit is preferred by the vast majority of people who have tried it?
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Steven Degutis <sbdegu...@gmail.com> wrote: > The vast majority of people who have tried paredit prefer using it, your > reaction is very rare. So this is as far from "YMMV" as you can get. > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
