Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> writes: > I've tried paredit several times and dislike it. I found that while > editing the code, I spent a lot of mental energy trying to figure out > how to edit the code within the constraints of the > structure-preserving transformation key combos, which took away from > my ability to concentrate on the problem at hand.
That statement is also true for people new to emacs or even more vi. But after the key bindings mave made it into your muscle memory, there are probably no other editors that can be used that effectively for text editing as those two. When I started using paredit, I also found it awkward at first, but I kept on using it, and now I don't know how people can edit Lisp without it. Bye, Tassilo -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
