Actually, there is a school of thought that a 110% would work better in very 
light air (then a 155% or even a 135%). This is attributed to the fact that in 
order to generate lift, the airflow over the sail has to be laminar and if the 
sail is too long, the wind may not have enough energy to stay attached to the 
sail for such a long distance.

 

There was recently a long discussion on that topic at Sailboat Owners (Don 
Gillette’s forum). Even some prizes were awarded.

 

Marek

 

From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of John Pennie 
via CnC-List
Sent: August-25-15 20:00
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: John Pennie
Subject: Re: Stus-List C&C 26 Sail Plan Thoughts!

 

Oh come on, if you don't exaggerate a bit you're just not a sailor.

 

On the 110%, I've gone with a 120 for years when cruising.  It's just easier on 
everyone with little loss of speed vs. the 135 in lighter air. Whatever we 
loose in speed we make up for in quick tacking.  We're in NY harbor (Battery) 
so short tacks and chop are the norm as is wind in the 15 range. Even racing 
we're not shy about using the 120 in the cruising or double handed divisions.  
Smaller and well trimmed trumps bigger and sloppy.

 

Yes, people here have strong opinions and are a pita at times - until you need 
those strong opinions from a knowledgeable group.

 

Good luck

 

John



Sent from my iPad


On Aug 25, 2015, at 6:34 PM, Sam Salter via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> 
wrote:

‎A few things :

My genoa is an almost new laminate sail; The main is only 5 short seasons old; 
I've got a folding propeller ; my bottom is smooth like a babies - I take it 
out every winter!‎; I’m measuring speed with a Speed Puck (GPS)

 

The 8kn readings were brief and fleeting (not more than the 10secs to register 
in the instrument. The 7kn readings did register though, but they were not 
sustained - like the 6+kn readings were. During this whole time I was beating, 
which is why I pondered on the possibility of sustaining 7 or 8 on a beam reach.

 

I fairly regularly exceed theoretical hull speed - If you're not, you're not 
trying ! The 26 is not known to be a fast boat. I've done a lot to get her 
faster. There are a lot of faster C&C's on the water which is why the 26's 
aren't raced.

And yes the 27 is faster!

 

Sorry I pissed so many people off - I'll keep quiet in future! 

 

sam :-)


From: dwight veinot via CnC-List

Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 2:44 PM

To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com

Reply To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com

Cc: dwight veinot

Subject: Re: Stus-List C&C 26 Sail Plan Thoughts!

 

sorry Russ, I thought he said a beam reach must have missed the part about 
puffs, still that's very fast for a 26 but if he can do it course be damned as 
you say, then good for him




Dwight Veinot

C&C 35 MKII, Alianna

Head of St. Margaret's Bay, NS

d.ve...@bellaliant.net

 

 

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Russ & Melody via CnC-List 
<cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

Hi Dwight,

Please reread Sam's message before getting out the pitchforks. He said 7 or 8, 
in the puffs. I would not characterize puffs as "regular"... 

On a prairie lake I think his experience is quite achievable in hot summer 
conditions when all you want to do is sail fast, course be damned.

        
        Cheers, Russ
        Sweet mk-1



At 10:05 AM 25/08/2015, you wrote:



what do you mean by 7kn to 8kn regularly? 

If you mean 7 knots or 8 knots through the water or over the ground with a C&C 
26 I would say you should be a race winner every time on corrected time; that 
is really fast for a C&C 26 even on a beam reach and I got a feeling you would 
probably leave my 35 MKII struggling to stay close behind...before everyone 
runs out to get a C&C 26 are you sure about those numbers; I have only ever 
seen a couple of C&C 26's around here...I don't remember them being quite that 
slippery, in fact my C&C 27 MKIII always seemed to be much faster on all points 
of sail

Dwight Veinot
C&C 35 MKII, Alianna
Head of St. Margaret's Bay, NS
d.ve...@bellaliant.net


On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Sam Salter via CnC-List 
<cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

I know there’s a few 26 owners on here so thought I’d share my thoughts on 
optimizing my sail plan.

Jump in anyone, I’m open to any thoughts!

 

Was out sailing today, only boat on the lake – I love that! So I thought we’d 
play around with the saill plan.

Wind was 8kn -12kn. (Estimate – I usually think if I ssee the occasional 
whitecap it’s around 10kn)

 

I have a 135% laminate genoa from Evolution Sails in Toronto (2 seasons). A 
Dacron main with 2 full and 2 partial battens from Leiche & McBride in 
Vancouver (5 seasons).

 

I have a flexofold prop; 4-1 outhaul; Garhauer genoa cars; Harken traveller; 
Cunningham; Garhauer ridged vang; (no backstay adjuster)

 

The C&C 26 is a tender boat and we were doing about 5.5kn to 6kn beating to 
windward at 20deg – 25deg heel. Flattening with the outhaul reduced heel a bit. 
(speed measured with a Speed Puck)

Furled the genoa to about 110%. Just brought the leech forward of the spreaders 
so no interference.

Boat stood up to 13deg to 16deg. Speed was between 5.8kn – 6.4kn. Went up to 
7kn or 8kn in the puffs (theoretical hulll speed is 6.25kn) No bubble in the 
luff of the main.

Obviously, the furled genoa wasn’t setting great and the starboard tack was 
better than port tack. On a beam reach I think she’d do 7kn or 8kn regularly.

 

So here’s my thoughts:

I’m thinking of getting the genoa recut to a 110% or if that’s not 
practical (...and I suspect it isn’t) order a new 110%.

Eventually a new laminate main will be needed too!

I’m well pleased with 6+kns at 10kn of wind and 16deg angle of heel. Very 
little weather helm

I’ve not tried it yet with the genoa at 110% in light wind. In heavy air the 
main can still be reefed (...as could the 110%).

 

OK guys, am I missing something?

(I’m not looking for advice on where to buy used sails!)

 

sam :-)

C&C 26Â  Liquorice

Ghost Lake  Alberta

 

_______________________________________________

Email address:

CnC-List@cnc-list.com

To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:

http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com




_______________________________________________

Email address:
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com 


_______________________________________________

Email address:
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com



 





_______________________________________________

Email address:
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com

_______________________________________________

Email address:
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com

Reply via email to