I think the point here is that you cant remove the specific ban in X based on mask, without removing any other ban set in X which masks that ban ...
On the old X you could, with this version of X you can often easily remove other bans that you might want to leave behind eg: *!~[EMAIL PROTECTED] would be removed if someone set - and then removed - *!~*@* With the old X, you could unban just the *!~*@* listing, eg remove that ban from X, without the other existing bans being touched. or to put it another way, someone banning and then removing the ban for *!*@* *in X* would cause ALL bans listed in X (at or below the users access level) to be removed. Shouldnt be the case. At 01:18 11/12/01 +0100, you wrote: >At 00:26 11/12/2001, you wrote: > >Hi there, > > > >I observed something weird a couple of minutes ago. There's something > that doesnt work correctly with the bans: > > > >look what happens if I type this on an empty or full channelm with or > without bans on it: > >/mode #uhuh +bbbb <mailto:*!~test@test>*!~test@test > <mailto:*!~2test2@2test>*!~2test2@2test > <mailto:*!~3test3@3test>*!~3test3@3test *!~*@* > >[18:12] *** Hidden sets mode: -bbb > <mailto:*!~3test3@3test>*!~3test3@3test > <mailto:*!~2test2@2test>*!~2test2@2test <mailto:*!~test@test>*!~test@test > >[18:12] *** Hidden sets mode: +bbbb <mailto:*!~test@test>*!~test@test > <mailto:*!~2test2@2test>*!~2test2@2test > <mailto:*!~3test3@3test>*!~3test3@3test *!~*@* > >this is not really what its suppose to do/show, it says it added 4 bans, > but the banlist is: > >#uhuh *!~*@* set by Hidden (Mon Dec 10 18:12:24) > >#uhuh End of Channel Ban List > > > >I just thought I should let the coders know :) > > > >Hello >you remember that 'trick' to clean a banlist ? > >/mode #channel +b-b *!*@* *!*@* ? > >i think what you found as a bug here is just a "feature" that if you put a >ban on > >*!*@1.2.3.*, >*!*@1.2.4.*, >*!*@1.2.5.*... >then put one on *!*@1.2.* .. it will just remove the others already >covered by this new one >to save space in banlist. > >So .. the *!~*@* covered the other 3 bans, so imho .. i dont see a bug >anywhere here. > >I hope this answered to your question ;) > >regards, > > > > >Hidden > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >note: no need to cc the answer(s) to me, I'm already on the list and > dont wish to receive 2 same messages :) > > ----------------------------------------------- > nighty - Undernet IRC Operator > ----------------------------------------------- > Paris.FR.EU.Undernet.Org > ----------------------------------------------- > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >PGP key available at >http://www.ecp-net.com/pgpkeys.php3?mail=nighty%40undernet.org >FingerPrint : 40A8 D43E E4EB D04D D7AD A9AC 2392 A17F E57C C83E > -----------------------------------------------
