Ok, I stand corrected - Hidden and I were discussing the X ban thing online
at the same time as he reported the ban issue, I muddled the two :P
I tried it:
/mode #zonefive +bbbb *!~test@test *!~2test2@2test *!~3test3@3test *!~*@*
[06:08] *** Mode change for #zonefive by BlakJak: -bbb *!~3test3@3test
*!~2test2@2test
*!~test@test
[06:08] *** Mode change for #zonefive by BlakJak: +bbbb *!~test@test
*!~2test2@2test
*!~3test3@3test *!~*@*
[06:08] *** Mode change for #zonefive by BlakSun: -b *!~*@*
[08:55] ### Client: ircII EPIC4-1.0.1 (Internal Version: 20010417)
[06:08] ### McLean.VA.us.undernet.org Server version: u2.10.10.pl15
At 23:11 10/12/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>It appears that so far very few people have taken the time to understand
>what it is Hidden is reporting. When I look at the log he sent along, I
>see him issuing one set of four bans. The mode messages that get sent
>out, however, are two sets, the first of 3 bans, all removed, and the
>second of 4 bans, all added--and the order is incorrect. If you mentally
>process the bans as he shows, you end up with 4 bans on the channel when
>in fact there is only one--the last one in his sequence. (You also see
>bans removed that weren't present in the first place.)
>
>What he has reported is in fact a bug--ircu should not behave in this
>fashion. There's a slim chance that it is a bug in his client, but I
>would place the probability of that being the case at about 5-10%--no
>client I know of keeps track of the channel's ban list.
>
>My original question stands: What server version displays this behavior?
>--
>Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
