hi there, I was going to reply to the other mails, but I see you understood so there's no need :)
The version of the server is: u2.10.10.pl15. Flanders.Be.Eu.Undernet.org B64eEFfHIKMpStUW I use mIRC 5.91 and here's the output in telnet: :Flanders.Be.Eu.Undernet.org NOTICE hidd :on 9 ca 1(4) ft 10(10) tr join #eheh :[EMAIL PROTECTED] JOIN :#eheh :Flanders.Be.Eu.Undernet.org 353 hidd = #eheh :@hidd :Flanders.Be.Eu.Undernet.org 366 hidd #eheh :End of /NAMES list. mode #eheh +bbbb *!~test@test *!~2test2@2test *!~3test3@3test *!~*@* :[EMAIL PROTECTED] MODE #eheh -bbb *!~3test3@3test *!~2test2@2test *!~test@test :[EMAIL PROTECTED] MODE #eheh +bbbb *!~test@test *!~2test2@2test *!~3test3@3test *!~*@* mode #eheh +b :Flanders.Be.Eu.Undernet.org 367 hidd #eheh *!~*@* hidd 1008045799 :Flanders.Be.Eu.Undernet.org 368 hidd #eheh :End of Channel Ban List I also tried with a pl18 version, Diemen.*. Same thing here: :Diemen.NL.EU.Undernet.org NOTICE hidd :on 9 ca 1(4) ft 10(10) tr join #eheh :[EMAIL PROTECTED] JOIN :#eheh :Diemen.NL.EU.Undernet.org 353 hidd = #eheh :@hidd :Diemen.NL.EU.Undernet.org 366 hidd #eheh :End of /NAMES list. mode #eheh +bbbb *!~test@test *!~2test2@2test *!~3test3@3test *!~*@* :[EMAIL PROTECTED] MODE #eheh -bbb *!~3test3@3test *!~2test2@2test *!~test@test :[EMAIL PROTECTED] MODE #eheh +bbbb *!~test@test *!~2test2@2test *!~3test3@3test *!~*@* mode #eheh +b :Diemen.NL.EU.Undernet.org 367 hidd #eheh *!~*@* hidd 1008045989 :Diemen.NL.EU.Undernet.org 368 hidd #eheh :End of Channel Ban List version :Diemen.NL.EU.Undernet.org 351 hidd u2.10.10.pl18.(release). Diemen.NL.EU.Undernet.org :B120eEFfHIKMptUvW Hidden ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 11:11 PM Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ? > It appears that so far very few people have taken the time to understand > what it is Hidden is reporting. When I look at the log he sent along, I > see him issuing one set of four bans. The mode messages that get sent > out, however, are two sets, the first of 3 bans, all removed, and the > second of 4 bans, all added--and the order is incorrect. If you mentally > process the bans as he shows, you end up with 4 bans on the channel when > in fact there is only one--the last one in his sequence. (You also see > bans removed that weren't present in the first place.) > > What he has reported is in fact a bug--ircu should not behave in this > fashion. There's a slim chance that it is a bug in his client, but I > would place the probability of that being the case at about 5-10%--no > client I know of keeps track of the channel's ban list. > > My original question stands: What server version displays this behavior? > -- > Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
