The only problem is that jelly is still in sandbox. be in a suficiently stable state ( if other components start to have deps ). So it may be the time for someone to make the proposal for commons.
Costin Morgan Delagrange wrote: > Hey all, > > I finished a rough cut conversion of the Latka tags > and validators to Jelly. The Jelly tags have syntax > identical to the previous Latka tags. I think it will > be pretty easy to emulate Latka variables inside the > Jelly expression language (JEXL). With a patch I made > to Jelly this week, I think even the lack of a > namespace declaration in existing scripts will not be > a problem. > > I believe that the functionality of the Jelly tags is > actually a complete superset of the previous > implementation. The command line interface should be > able to function unchanged if converted to a Jelly > backend, but the new tags will make it much easier to > run Latka inside applications like Ant and JUnit. I > propose that we make Jelly one of Latka's > dependencies, so that we can remove the XML handlers > and processors that support the previous tags. In my > view, the Jelly implementation is much cleaner and > will render the old tags unnecessary. > > - Morgan > > ===== > Morgan Delagrange > http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons > http://axion.tigris.org > http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More > http://faith.yahoo.com -- Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
