Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14/10/2002 06:09:54 PM:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Is there a rule somewhere about not having sandbox components as a > > dependency? Or is this a general call to move Jelly to commons? > > It's really time Jelly goes to Commons proper, don't you think? Yes, I do. But I'm more interested in whether there is a rule somewhere about sandbox components as dependencies, since that sparked Costin's comments. > It's more active than Latka itself ATM, and used by more and more > Jakarta projects. It's more active than most of commons....... > +1 > > Let's see the plan :-) Go for it :) -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Work: http://www.multitask.com.au Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers
