Is there a rule somewhere about not having sandbox components as a 
dependency? Or is this a general call to move Jelly to commons?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Work:      http://www.multitask.com.au
Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers


news <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14/10/2002 04:07:16 PM:

> The only problem is that jelly is still in sandbox.
> 
> be in a suficiently stable state ( if other components
> start to have deps ). So it may be the time for someone
> to make the proposal  for commons.
> 
> Costin
> 
> 
> Morgan Delagrange wrote:
> 
> > Hey all,
> > 
> > I finished a rough cut conversion of the Latka tags
> > and validators to Jelly.  The Jelly tags have syntax
> > identical to the previous Latka tags.  I think it will
> > be pretty easy to emulate Latka variables inside the
> > Jelly expression language (JEXL).  With a patch I made
> > to Jelly this week, I think even the lack of a
> > namespace declaration in existing scripts will not be
> > a problem.
> > 
> > I believe that the functionality of the Jelly tags is
> > actually a complete superset of the previous
> > implementation.  The command line interface should be
> > able to function unchanged if converted to a Jelly
> > backend, but the new tags will make it much easier to
> > run Latka inside applications like Ant and JUnit.  I
> > propose that we make Jelly one of Latka's
> > dependencies, so that we can remove the XML handlers
> > and processors that support the previous tags.  In my
> > view, the Jelly implementation is much cleaner and
> > will render the old tags unnecessary.
> > 
> > - Morgan
> > 
> > =====
> > Morgan Delagrange
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
> > http://axion.tigris.org
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
> > http://faith.yahoo.com
> 
> -- 
> Costin
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 

Reply via email to