On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, James Strachan wrote:

>
> So I'm starting to think it needs to be a top level project with its own
> sub-projects. Do others think this is a good idea? Either way I'd like to
> see Jelly promoted very soon.
>

If the plan is to have Jelly be a "framework" of its own accord, top-level
is definitely the way to go.  Given the amount of interest in it, that
makes a lot of sense to me.

Craig


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to