On Monday 14 October 2002 05:11 pm, Costin Manolache wrote: > James Strachan wrote: > > I'd really like a stable release of Jelly out ASAP so migrating it to the > > commons proper sounds like a great idea. > > There is no need for a stable release. > > All you need ( IMO ) is a community and a plan to eventually get > a release. In fact, I think it's a really bad idea to move from sandbox to a stable release. Although jelly seems to have good visibility, I know I don't, as a rule, look very carefully at sandbox projects. I've assumed that once they get past the proof of concept stage, they'll be proposed as a commons project. I suspect I'm not the only one. And that means that a sandbox project gets limited review.
Jelly seems to be exceptional, in that there's a lot of interest and use, but I'd hate to see a precedent that a sandbox project can go to immediate release. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
