So how to the projects go about this then? I like Costin's 'util libraries ( logging, discovery, modeler, collections, etc )' group and as a committer to the following projects [io, dbutils, lang, collections] would like to propose they move to such a list.
I'm not a fulltime committer to CLI/BeanUtils, but I've had involvement with those projects and would like to propose they also move to the util-library list. I don't expect my vote to count with these projects however. I'm not a committer at all on discovery, logging, modeler, but think it would be nice if someone proposed their moving to the util-library list. [All said with a touch of irony, but it seems to fit the regulations and NK, Craig and Morgan's reservation] Hen On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > > > On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Morgan Delagrange wrote: > > > > > >>If they want a separate list, that's fine. I'm -1 on > >>pressuring components into leaving the commons list. > > > > I agree with Morgan. > > I agree too. > > I'm posting this meetoo because I really think it is. These > splits-merges-moves are just conceptual suggestions made as random > thoughts. It's up to the communities decide. > > -- > Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - verba volant, scripta manent - > (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
