some observations (made in the spirit of Nicola's 'conceptual suggestions
made as random thoughts')
email volume
------------
the high volume of email on this list deters some potential committers.
IMHO it's manageable at the moment but maybe now is a good time to think
about whether we could manage with many more components.
a single commons mailing list is good
-----------------------------------
i think that sharing a single mailing list is a GOOD THING. i think that
it encourages people from different components to share ideas and come up
with better solutions than they would in isolation. it also creates a
collective spirit.
of course, it's quite possible to have too much of a good thing :)
sandbox components
------------------
sandbox components need to remain on the main commons list. these
components would simply not be visible enough on other lists. this lack of
visibility will make it even harder than now for these components to
generate the momentum and the communities they need.
single component mailing lists
------------------------------
i think that single component mailing lists have not proved very
successful.
not only are they unpopular with the components themselves but they are
hard for outsiders to monitor. i (for one) have no idea about what's
happening in httpclient and i cannot effectively supervise them.
when we decided to push them out onto their own list, i thought that all
votes were supposed to remain on the main list. i don't recall seeing any
VOTEs on this list about new committers or about releases. (i'm not saying
that there's been any impropriety - just that if there was, there's no way
that i'd know.)
if half a dozen components were pushed into their own mailing lists, then
this could become an important issue.
conclusions
-----------
i don't like the idea of asking components to leave the main mailing list
but i do think that this is something we'll have to face sooner or later.
i think that topic based lists are preferable to single component lists.
i think that these topics should be sufficiently broad to retain both the
synergy that we have at the moment and the ability to collectively
supervise the projects. new topic based mailing lists should not be
created unless there will be a large enough community to make them viable.
i'd like the idea about all VOTEs taking place on a single list enforced.
possible component groupings
----------------------------
BeanUtils, CLI, Collections, Discovery, Lang, Logging should have enough
momentum to a become a viable core grouping.
JXPath, jelly, betwixt, digester may be big enough to become a viable xml
grouping
pool, DBCP could fit together into a cache group - but i think that it
would be too small to be viable.
httpclient, latka, fileupload could fit together into a http group - but
again, probably too small.
- robert
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Time for more mailing lists ? Costin Manolache
- Re: Time for more mailing lists ? Henri Yandell
- Re: Time for more mailing lists ? Nicola Ken Barozzi
- Re: Time for more mailing lists ? Henri Yandell
- Re: Time for more mailing lists ? Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Time for more mailing lists ? Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Time for more mailing lists ? Nicola Ken Barozzi
- Re: Time for more mailing list... Juozas Baliuka
- Re: Time for more mailing list... Henri Yandell
- Re: Time for more mailing list... robert burrell donkin
- Re: Time for more mailing ... Henri Yandell
- Re: Time for more mail... Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Time for more mailing ... Jeffrey Dever
- Re: Time for more mail... Mark R. Diggory
- Re: Time for more mailing lists ? Ola Berg
- Re: Time for more mailing lists ? Jeffrey Dever
- Re: Time for more mailing lists ? Peter Royal
- Re: Time for more mailing lists ? Costin Manolache
- Re: Time for more mailing lists ? scolebourne
- Re: Time for more mailing lists ? Stephen Colebourne