robert, i like beanutils very much. but the assumption being made is, that the target object either implements set/get according to spec or is an instance of DynaBean.
imo it would be appreciated by many users (at least in the longterm) if an interface and/or factory is provided which, call it a "use case", allows for custom DynaBean-like behaviour. regards, ricardo ps. do you mean sending example implementation? --- robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi ricky > > beanutils adds quite a few powerful features which > (seems to me to) > justify these dependencies. > > there are some good reasons why it might be useful > to abstract the actual > population from the mechanism used to perform the > population. i'm not sure > whether the best way to do this would be through > delegation to a strategy > interface or through inheritance. i'd be interested > to here other people's > views on this. > > i don't seem to get as much coding time as i'd like > these days so i > probably won't get round to coding this any time > soon but patches > (including test cases ;) would be gratefully > received. ________________________________________________________________________ Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger http://mail.messenger.yahoo.co.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
