"splitting" here means "splitting the mailing lists" I had not read robert's proposal before posting this.
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > -0 on splitting commons-math. I don't mind the traffic, and would expect > it to be cyclical anyway. (E.g., Jelly was once a very big part of > commons dev traffic, but isn't anymore. primitives has been the source of > lot of traffic recently, and may be off and on for the next few weeks, but > I wouldn't expect that to continue.) I'd think math either reaches a > certain level of maturity/stability, and hence generates less traffic, or > grows to a point where it no longer belongs in commons at all. > > -1 on splitting off hivemind by the way. It's not even a commons-proper > component yet, so if it's not something of interest to the general > commons-dev list, it should move to tapestry-sandbox or sourceforge or > something. A sandbox only component should not have it's own list. > Where's the oversight? Where's the community? > > -1 on splitting off jelly, unless its to move jelly out of commons > entirely. Jelly accounts for very little traffic these days. > > On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Mark R. Diggory wrote: > > > I know from positions taken by Craig and others there is some interest > > in seeing some of the discussion in the math project get moved off to > > another list. I know that sometimes the lengthy discussions we have > > about what must appear to some to be like "String Theory", just PLAIN > > OUT THERE... ;) > > > > If its really in the publics interest, I'd be willing to propose > > possibly starting a separate math developers list. Let me know if > > theres really a consensus of opinion on this. > > > > -Mark > > > > > > -- - Rod <http://radio.weblogs.com/0122027/> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
