-0 on splitting commons-math. I don't mind the traffic, and would expect it to be cyclical anyway. (E.g., Jelly was once a very big part of commons dev traffic, but isn't anymore. primitives has been the source of lot of traffic recently, and may be off and on for the next few weeks, but I wouldn't expect that to continue.) I'd think math either reaches a certain level of maturity/stability, and hence generates less traffic, or grows to a point where it no longer belongs in commons at all.
-1 on splitting off hivemind by the way. It's not even a commons-proper component yet, so if it's not something of interest to the general commons-dev list, it should move to tapestry-sandbox or sourceforge or something. A sandbox only component should not have it's own list. Where's the oversight? Where's the community? -1 on splitting off jelly, unless its to move jelly out of commons entirely. Jelly accounts for very little traffic these days. On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Mark R. Diggory wrote: > I know from positions taken by Craig and others there is some interest > in seeing some of the discussion in the math project get moved off to > another list. I know that sometimes the lengthy discussions we have > about what must appear to some to be like "String Theory", just PLAIN > OUT THERE... ;) > > If its really in the publics interest, I'd be willing to propose > possibly starting a separate math developers list. Let me know if > theres really a consensus of opinion on this. > > -Mark > > -- - Rod <http://radio.weblogs.com/0122027/> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
