On 6/19/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Here's the result of the vote:
+1: Sebb, Oliver, Niall, Ben, Myself
<snip/>
And +1 from Gary in another thread [1] -- though in a subsequent post
in the same thread he does express some interest in having the version
number be 1.4.
-1: Stephen
No votes from Henri and Dion.
My understanding is, that Stephen's vote isn't counted as a veto, but
I'd like to ask you to correct me, if I'm wrong. In which case the
vote had failed.
<snap/>
Correct, it isn't a veto. In this case, it is upto you (being the RM)
to decide whether to go ahead with putting the bits on the mirrors
etc. since you have the required votes.
I did not understand your comment about the version number [2] as it
relates to whether deprecations should preclude release++ from being a
point release. Regardless of what you choose to do here, we should
(collectively) form an opinion and clarify this in the versioning
guide for future reference. I am of the opinion that it shouldn't be a
point release.
-Rahul
[1]
http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A-Still-no-votes%21-%28WAS%3A--VOTE--3rd-attempt%3A-Release-commons-io-1.3.2%29-p11091530.html
[2]
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Still-no-votes%21-%28WAS%3A--VOTE--3rd-attempt%3A-Release-commons-io-1.3.2%29-p11093009.html
Thanks,
Jochen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
