On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Sander Striker wrote:
> > From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 28 October 2002 20:15 > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:05:28AM -0800, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > > I hereby nominate Ted Husted. > > > > The problem with nominations in a forum that does not perfectly match > > the voting body is that it makes it difficult to hold discussions > > about the nominee in a fair way. Nominations, IMNSHO, belong on the > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I totally agree. There should be two parties informed: the nominee > and the members. No more, no less. Disagree and agree. I think your and Aaron's points are good, and that your line above is nearly good. When successfully nominated, I think the 'promotion' of the committer to a member should be trumpeted on community. There's no need to know about the voting, and whether someone doesn't get in, but there is a need to know when someone gets in to help build community. Hen
