On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 22:48 -0400, Don Dailey wrote:
> Of course it would be nice if in the future, the cgos_ part could
> be dropped and these commands could be standardized.
>
> The other possibility is to be able to specify the system in a
> standardized version of the protocol:
>
> elo cgos white Fatman 1800
> rank kgs black SomeBot 5k
This should have been elo cgos white 1800
and rank kgs black 5k
since presumably the names of the players would
be send to the engine via a different command.
> ... in order to specify the entity that performs the rating
> calculations.
Previously I specified the command "cgos_name", but it shouldn't
be called that s I just noticed that it conflicts
with another GTP command. So let's just focus on a cgos
version. Here is the modified proposal:
cgos_player color name
example: cgos_player white Lazarus
cgos_elo color elo_rating
example: cgos_elo white 1739?
and since cgos does use kyu/dan, I don't want to specify
a command at this time, but if I do it would likely be:
cgos_rank color rank
Notice that I'm calling the first command cgos_player instead
of "cgos_name" because "name" is already a GTP command and
thus it could never have a chance of becoming a
standard GTP command.
- Don
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
