Statistically speaking, I can say with 99.9% confidence that hb-amaf-1k-v2 is stronger than genAnchor-1k. No need to wait any longer to conclude that :) The math to compute the one-tailed p-value for rejecting the null hypothesis that the bots are the same strength is left as an exercise for the reader ;)
On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 07:20 -0700, steve uurtamo wrote: > > Strangely enough, it now appears that hb-amaf-1k-v2 is significantly > > stronger than genAnchor-1k, defeating it 9 out of 9 times. I still have > > to wonder what the cause of the strength difference is. > > now is the time to just let it run for a few weeks and check on the > stats later. > > s. > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the hottest shows > on Yahoo! TV. > http://tv.yahoo.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
