On 20/11/2013 06:45, Detlef Schmicker wrote:
After turning off pondering in pachi the plot looks much more sensible:
http://physik.de/playouts.pdf
What is the relationship between "ELO" as shown on the graph, and Go
rating, in AGA or EGF terms?
Nick
I will now do some comparison with proportional increasing playouts in
pachi and oakfoam.
Detlef
Am Montag, den 18.11.2013, 21:11 +0100 schrieb Petr Baudis:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 03:11:22PM +0100, Erik van der Werf wrote:
make sure Pachi isn't doing any kind of pondering in the
background.
Indeed, Pachi will ponder by default. Turn pondering off by passing
pondering=0
on the commandline.
pachi -d 0 -t =4000 -r chinese threads=1,max_tree_size=2048
Also, it may be worth passing pass_all_alive unless you are doing a
sophisticated scoring procedure, to make sure Pachi captures all dead
groups at the end of the game.
P.S.: Do your results imply that on 4000 playouts/move, oakfoam is
quite stronger than Pachi now? I'd love to hear more. :) How does the
playout speed compare?
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@dvandva.org
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
--
Nick Wedd
n...@maproom.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@dvandva.org
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
