On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Aug 26, 2010, at 6:14 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > >> Is it clear that ACF is dead? The concern raised was that it implied >> something that connected lots of stuff together, and that's not what it >> was. But I think that that IS what it is, so the poster knew little or >> nothing about the project, and was operating from ignorance. Does it make >> sense to clarify what ACF does to the general list first? > > I think it is worthwhile. You want to take a crack at it? Absolutely +1 - I just have the impression that people are already biased by Tomcat Connector etc. but I will be a supporter of Apache Connector FW, no doubt. If it is not an option we can still discuss here!
simon > >> >> Karl >> >> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Simon Willnauer < >> simon.willna...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hey folks, >>> >>> I was following the discussion about changing the name to Apache >>> Connector Framework and the late response from people on gene...@. >>> Obviously we need to decide on something else than Apache Connectors >>> Framework since many people had concerns about the name and possible >>> confusion. I have the impression we should first collect some >>> suggestions about alternative names here before we continue discussion >>> on the gene...@. Once we have a name we all agreed on and doesn't >>> apply to the concerns others had we should go back and discuss >>> further. >>> Some folks suggested a more abstract name like Apache Connecto which I >>> personally like (not necessarily Connecto but a more abstract name. >>> Such names have many advantages as people remember short names and >>> they are less ambiguous. >>> >>> Any suggestions, thoughts? >>> >>> simon >>> > > -------------------------- > Grant Ingersoll > http://lucenerevolution.org Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8 > >
