David Hedbor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you have an ISO-rescue-image, there really isn't any reason why it > would _have_ to be minimal other than to save potential download time. one reason is the ability to fit in ramdisk and free the cdrom drive... another reason for having it in ramdisk is the speed (cdrom access time is poor to say the least)
- RE: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? Roger
- Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? David Hedbor
- Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? Tim & Val Litwiller
- Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? webmedic
- Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? webmedic
- Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? Ivan Kerekes
- Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? David Hedbor
- Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? Guy T. Rice
- Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? webmedic
- Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? Roger
- Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? Hoyt
- RE: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? Roger
- Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? Roger