Quoting Luca Berra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> > Quoting Luca Berra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>smth like debian & suse?
> > i think they have smth like /etc/rc.boot where let say 
> > installing raidtools would drop a init script for activating the soft
> raids
> > installing lvm-tools ........................................ the VG's &
> LV's
> 
> this could be a good idea to try post 9.2, methinks.

metoo :)

> > after i used my LVM1 version LV's with LVM2, i can no longer access them
> > with MDK-9.1/ LVM1 tools & update kernel -25mdk 
> > i have 4 xfs LV's and 1 reiserfs
> ...
> 
> > both times device 3a:00
> > 
> > under cooker with LVM2 everythings works OK
> 
> i saw this bug once, but i tried rebooting with LVM1 today and did not 
> have any problem. could it be that lvm2 does (or did in a previous 
> version) some weird things with lvm metadata?

probably yes, but that was with devmapper-1.00.02 & LVM2-2.00.05

and the standard LVM1 tools in MDK-9.1
 
> >>it is pratically possible 
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # ./vgdisplay
> >>  /proc/lvm/VGs/vg00 exists: Is the original LVM driver using this volume
> >>group?
> >>Can't lock vg00: skipping
> 
> > and can you load dm-mod after that and activate different VG (without 
> > deactivating vg00)? i think this shouldn't be possible.
> dunno and actually don't want to try. just say we won't support mixing 
> lvm1 and lvm2.
> 
> > well,
> > i know you belive it's absolutely save to have "/" on lvm (lvm & cooker ml
> 
> > posts) but i'm still not convinced, and the mdk team probably too,
> > so initrd & lilo are not important as the tools & devmapper (just my
> thoughts) 
> ok, but i still would like to be able to do it manually if i so wish. as 
> i am able to do it with lvm1 (changes to mkinitrd are small, if we want 
> to keep mkinitrd as it is)

OK, let's hope some one will merge them :)
 
> >>>may be we should then drop the HB08... and fix x86_64 to use the
> devmapper
> > anyone out there running cooker on a x86_64 ?
> > 
> well' i checked the sources for 2.6 kernel and they use
> extern __inline__ int generic_fls(int x)
> so we could drop fls from device-mapper patch instead.

good news :-)

so we have to patch dm-io.[ch]
(and update to the new version)

svetljo


Reply via email to