Joshua Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > X is using 33MB but XMMS is showed has holding 4 processes as 11MB RAM > each. I noticed that Licq likes to open child processes, too. Would > the 50MB's of XMMS be a memory leak or is that just how it is? I don't > know if that size gets bigger as a night of MP3 playing goes, 'cuz I > haven't played any, and I'm going to bed now. Linux handles threading this way: from the processes point of view, it spawns some new processes; but they are not "true" processes, and the memory is not eated 11*4 Mbytes but only 11 Mbytes. (e.g. between threads, memory is shared) -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Francis Galiegue
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Meir Faraj
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Meir Faraj
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Meir Faraj