The old-school way of configuring swap space was, if I remember correctly, twice as much as you have physical RAM. Now, that does seem pointless in todays RAM-happy computers. There are probably many people that still do it, habitually. JJ Alexander Skwar wrote: > > Why? If he isn't even using the 128 Megs he allocated, what good should it > do to allocate >= 256 MB as you suggest? > > Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Francis Galiegue
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Meir Faraj
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Meir Faraj
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Meir Faraj
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Meir Faraj