On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 08:52, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > N Smethurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Le Jeudi 6 Mars 2003 16:47, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit : > > > Well that depends. Most non-kernel and non-install bugs are > > > looked at even in unconfirmed state - most of them are real and > > > fixable. > > > > > I know this is frustrating for reporters to "get ignored", but as > > > for the aim of bugzilla, e.g. track & fix bugs, it's now in a > > > state where it's really usable and helping us much to fix bugs. > > > > Maybe there should be a "someone has had a look at this" bug status for > > bugs that developers do look at but don't want to officially commit to ? > > IMO it's not needed. With the mail interface, it's very easy for > us to comment on it, if we want to.
I like GNOME's NEEDMOREINFO status. It nicely tells the reporter that their bug report wasn't all it could be, and lets the package maintainer ignore the bug until they do get more info. /curtis
