Le Thu, 06 Mar 2003 21:09:31 -0800, Curtis Hildebrand a écrit : > On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 08:52, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: >> N Smethurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Le Jeudi 6 Mars 2003 16:47, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit : >> > > Well that depends. Most non-kernel and non-install bugs are >> > > looked at even in unconfirmed state - most of them are real and >> > > fixable. >> > >> > > I know this is frustrating for reporters to "get ignored", but as >> > > for the aim of bugzilla, e.g. track & fix bugs, it's now in a >> > > state where it's really usable and helping us much to fix bugs. >> > >> > Maybe there should be a "someone has had a look at this" bug status for >> > bugs that developers do look at but don't want to officially commit to ? >> >> IMO it's not needed. With the mail interface, it's very easy for >> us to comment on it, if we want to. > > I like GNOME's NEEDMOREINFO status. It nicely tells the reporter that > their bug report wasn't all it could be, and lets the package maintainer > ignore the bug until they do get more info.
VERY GOOD IDEA... Warly, any hope to add this on our bugzilla ? -- Frédéric Crozat MandrakeSoft
