Here is the latest webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~reinhapa/reviews/8134373/webrev.02
-Patrick > Am 07.10.2016 um 12:00 schrieb Jonathan Bluett-Duncan > <jbluettdun...@gmail.com>: > > Hi all, > > Sorry for the delayed response, I've been busy lately with university and > other things. > > Thank you all for your comments. I'll leave the DateTimeFormatter comment in, > as you requested Stephen and Roger, and I'll work again with Patrick as soon > as I'm ready. > > Kind regards, > Jonathan > > On 6 October 2016 at 09:38, Stephen Colebourne <scolebou...@joda.org> wrote: > On 6 October 2016 at 00:00, Stuart Marks <stuart.ma...@oracle.com> wrote: > >> I think you should perform no change to DateTimeFormatter (other than > >> a comment) as part of this changeset. The behaviour of that > >> DateTimeFormatter method is subtle, and I now suspect that what we > >> have there might be the best option. > > > > I had recommended removing the comment from DateTimeFormatter, but if > > Stephen wants the comment in, that's fine with me. In fact I'll defer to > > what Stephen (and Roger Riggs) want with this code, since they're the > > maintainers. > > I think it makes sense to leave the new comment in. All further change > should be under 8167222. > > Stephen >
