Hi all, Sorry for the delayed response, I've been busy lately with university and other things.
Thank you all for your comments. I'll leave the DateTimeFormatter comment in, as you requested Stephen and Roger, and I'll work again with Patrick as soon as I'm ready. Kind regards, Jonathan On 6 October 2016 at 09:38, Stephen Colebourne <scolebou...@joda.org> wrote: > On 6 October 2016 at 00:00, Stuart Marks <stuart.ma...@oracle.com> wrote: > >> I think you should perform no change to DateTimeFormatter (other than > >> a comment) as part of this changeset. The behaviour of that > >> DateTimeFormatter method is subtle, and I now suspect that what we > >> have there might be the best option. > > > > I had recommended removing the comment from DateTimeFormatter, but if > > Stephen wants the comment in, that's fine with me. In fact I'll defer to > > what Stephen (and Roger Riggs) want with this code, since they're the > > maintainers. > > I think it makes sense to leave the new comment in. All further change > should be under 8167222. > > Stephen >
