On 6 October 2016 at 00:00, Stuart Marks <stuart.ma...@oracle.com> wrote: >> I think you should perform no change to DateTimeFormatter (other than >> a comment) as part of this changeset. The behaviour of that >> DateTimeFormatter method is subtle, and I now suspect that what we >> have there might be the best option. > > I had recommended removing the comment from DateTimeFormatter, but if > Stephen wants the comment in, that's fine with me. In fact I'll defer to > what Stephen (and Roger Riggs) want with this code, since they're the > maintainers.
I think it makes sense to leave the new comment in. All further change should be under 8167222. Stephen
