----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- I do not own a gun or ever wish to own a gun. When I left the military, I gave it back. This bureaucat will not rest in peace until the criminal will be the only one in this country to have a gun! He is stupid! We need to remove from our society those who use a gun in the commission of a felony. PERMANENTLY! george Frebert
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000 14:55:34 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- > To All: My original post was sent to the Alon Group. Ed. some how in > replying to me sent it to the coupers. > > I am sorry that your list was so confused here is the original post from > Maynard Smith and my reply to him. I hope this clears this up. > > Cal. for some time has tried one way or another to take guns from us by > one method or another this is just their latest attempt. > > I am not sure at this time or not if this bill passed will check it out > tomorrow. > > Audean Woollard > N6596Q Salinas, Cal. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Maynards Post: Original was dated Aug.4, 2000 > > Good evening Folks: > This has nothing to do with Ercoupes. However, I feel it is quite > important. > If you feel as I do that the following has no place in our society > then please take the time to voice your opposition to this bad piece of > legislation. > Maynard Smith. > ======================================================================= > > Ladies & Gentleman: > > As early as 8/7/2000 the Calif. legislature could vote on AB 273, by > Assemblyman Jack Scott (D-Pasadena), that would require all handgun > buyers be licensed by the Calif. Dept. of Justice. In fact AB 273 would > require that all firearm buyers do the following before being able to > purchase any gun. > > 1. Pass a written test on firearms laws. > > 2. Be fingerprinted. > > 3. Pass a shooting proficiency test. > > 4. Register all handguns owned. > > This invasive, costly and time consuming mandate would result in mass > discrimination against normal law abiding people. Furthermore, if an > individual is under the age of 21, AB 273 mandates that they could only > use a handgun under the direct supervision of a licensed adult. > > If all that weren't enough AB 273 would require that once you are > registered you would be required to notify law enforcement whenever you > move - just like registered sex offenders. > > If you want to avoid the next worse thing to total confiscation in > California, it is imperative that you contact Assemblyman Jack Scott at > (919) 319-2044 to voice your opposition to AB 273. Look in the front of > your phone books for the Calif. legislators in you districts and tell > them you oppose AB 273. Also remind them you will be watching to see how > they vote. > > Time is short so pass this on to all your family and friends so that > they call before August 7th. > > Maynard Smith: Concerned citizen. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > My Reply: > > Maynard, you have said it very well. My family has grown up with guns > and I own several. > > I have no intentions of registering them in Cal. nor do I have any > intentions of giving them up. I guess I might become a criminal as I > will not give them up. > > One out of about 7 is registered only reason being it was my fathers > service revolver and had to be. It is in his name and it will remain > that way. > > We will sell out and leave this dam State before we comply with this. > The crime in my area is gross, I need my guns here in the country to > defend myself as the so called police department can not do so. We had a > life taken about 2 miles over from us. The gun might of made the > difference. A home in the country without the owner owning a gun has > became suicidal in the Good State of Cal. > > The so call fathers of this town has now decided to put gate keys out to > each of the policemen to be able to go on the airport to protect the > plane hangers from being broke into. I do not want to see the police > officers in this city with gate cards as they can not protect the people > out where the planes are, let alone protect a plane, the only thing that > will happen is the cards will be missing and so will planes and > equipment off of them while that policemen is having a donut or a > coffee break, more than likely at the restaurant at the airport that he > is suppose to be protecting. > > Audean > > __________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe from this list please send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ___________________________________________________________ > T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16 > Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics _______________________________________________________ Say Bye to Slow Internet! http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html __________________________________________________ To unsubscribe from this list please send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___________________________________________________________ T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16 Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
