Jolly: The torque application must in all cases be segmented anyway, 30% then 60% and release brakes. then 80% and 100% at rotate;. The thing about turbines is their reliability, and smoothness to say nothing of their power. The power to weight ratio would be astounding. The coupe with a Garrett and the wing cleaned up as we discussed could probably handle it, but would be very critical in several areas. Stall would be heavy and definite, torque yaw quite evident, and gone would be the anti spin characteristics. The benefits would be speed of course, spectacular ROC, substantially increased ceiling capabilities, payload, and reliability. The P&W (push and wait) probably would be better in terms of noise and reduced torque, but I think they take up more room. But what the heck, if you're going to modify, then modify. Lets make it a four place, and the Pratt would take the CG forward by extending the nose cowling and gear. Would have to look at the tail feathers too, would they handle the speed and maneuvering stress? Just some thoughts, Doug
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
