Hi *, by the way - in terms of non-openness and just from curiosity: what about datasets/objects in commcercial databases?
RF -- -- Prof. Dr. Reinhard Foertsch Universitaet zu Koeln CoDArchLab am Archaeologischen Institut Albertus Magnus Platz D - 50923 Koeln Fon: 0049/221/470-2946 Fax: 0049/221/470-5099 url: http://www.klassarchaeologie.uni-koeln.de/?q=node/86 AIM-Account for iChat: seezeichen18 @: foert...@me.com .:.:.:.Skype: rfoertsch.:.:.:. 'And remember: Jesus saves, but George Nelson withdraws' Am 30.05.2011 um 09:32 schrieb Maximilian Schich: > Hi Regine and all, > > In principle, I think, we can all imagine Linked Data that is non-open - > and in house museum inventory databases might be so very likely. But the > whole point about publishing identifier URIs for museum objects is that > they are available for everybody to cite. So indeed in our case the data > should be Linked Open Data. > > Also - notwithstanding my high regard of TBL - just because a concept > was introduced by him does not make it more letigimate, just as building > reconstructions do not become more realistic if we can attribute them to > Andrea Palladio. > > Best, Max > > Dr. Maximilian Schich > http://www.schich.info > http://artshumanities.netsci2011.net > > > Am 29.05.11 18:13, schrieb Regine Stein: >> Dear Martin, dear all, >> >> Apologies for the very late comment (however just in time for the >> deadline May 30th ;-)) >> >> I have one simple recommendation: Please replace "Linked Open Data" by >> "Linked Data" throughout the whole documents (and URL). >> >> First because Linked Data is the original term as it was invented by TBL >> if I'm not mistaken. >> >> Second because there is a serious debate ongoing on what "Open" means in >> Linked Open Data. >> E.g. according to the current view in Europeana office it means that all >> data to be published as LOD has to be public domain whereas many >> representatives of Europeana museum projects do question this requirement. >> >> Though this might appear to be a Europeana specific discussion I think >> there is no point for CIDOC to potentially cause confusion about the issue. >> >> Best wishes >> Regine >> >> >> Am 21.03.2011 17:02, schrieb martin: >>> Dear All, >>> >>> Your comments on http://www.cidoc-crm.org/URIs_and_Linked_Open_Data.html >>> will be most welcome! >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Martin > _______________________________________________ > Crm-sig mailing list > Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr > http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
