"Christianity is not about a set of behaviors; it is about a transformed
heart!" -- John Piper, *Desiring God*

On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Robert Johnson <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> And something similar should be said about entering sanctuaries, and the
> like.
>
> Bobby
>
>   On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Robert Johnson <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> What I say here doesn't necessarily conflict with anything anyone has
>> said, and it reemphasizes points already made, so I'm not trying to be
>> novel.  But here is a micro-sermon on the topic that fits the attitude of my
>> heart:
>>
>> Rob, you asked in one of your posts, "How much should the church change to
>> reach out to people?" My position is that if the church is focused on
>> removing hats to the detriment of the gospel, they should change that. Each
>> church I've seen who cares alot about how people dress tends to have a more
>> barren outreach.  That's a detriment to the gospel.  The gospel is about
>> changing hearts (internal), not about changing dress (external).
>> Accordingly, it seems to me, those who narrowly focus on how someone dresses
>> completely miss the point of the gospel message and the exemplary life of
>> Jesus, who took no concern of how people dress, but who looked into people's
>> hearts.  Yes, the point of the gospel is a changed heart towards God and
>> others.  Perhaps this changed heart will lead to taking off one's hat in
>> worship, but never will it lead to requiring people dress a certain way,
>> without first looking to the attitude of their heart.  So yes, it can be
>> appropriate to ask someone to take off their hat -- when it is an expression
>> of disrespect for the Lord.  But in our culture today, there's nothing
>> symbolic or overtly disrespectful about hats or head coverings, I don't
>> think.  So it's not much of an issue in most churches.  Perhaps Paul would
>> say today, don't put two middle fingers in the sky when praying or
>> prophesying.  This is an extreme example, but I wonder if it probes to the
>> point: Don't be disrespectful to the Lord when praying or prophesying.
>> Bobby
>>   On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Mike Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>
>>> Not placing my hand over my chest.  Taking my heart out while
>>> metaphorically poignant, is physically disgusting.
>>>
>>>  On Oct 22, 2008, at 2:37 PM, Mike Butler wrote:
>>>
>>>  Rob, I didn't perceive your statements regarding women as any type of
>>> ambivalence.  I was more interested in your feedback.  Here is something I
>>> was pondering today:
>>> Is there really any part of the building more "sacred" than another?
>>>  After all, there is only one type of room that has a "throne".  I guess I
>>> ask this because, I am in favor of removing my hat during prayer, I am not
>>> as adamant regarding "patriotic" practices.  That being said, other than not
>>> placing my heart over my chest, I am typically willing to "honor" our active
>>> and fallen soldiers (present and past) without any hesitation in all public
>>> forums.  I find it interesting that 1 Cor. 11 is often referenced in defense
>>> of removing a hat during prayer and when entering the "Sanctuary".  There
>>> doesn't seem to be any reference to the "location" being sacred, as much as
>>> the circumstance is sacred.  So my real question is this:  Is it biblically
>>> supported to remove you hat in a building?  We know that the head should be
>>> uncovered during worship, but given that in the early church most people
>>> worshipped in their homes.  Do you think it was expected of the person who
>>> owned the home to remove their hat when they entered the house (due to the
>>> fact that there weren't many homes with multiple rooms in the first century)
>>> during non-worship times?   Just curious.
>>>
>>>  On Oct 22, 2008, at 11:04 AM, Robert Long wrote:
>>>
>>>  I downloaded it but haven't listened  to it yet.  I'll try to today
>>> sometime.  Thought I'd go ahead and post though.  I hope I didn't give an
>>> impression that I have some sort of problem with women taking roles in the
>>> church.  I feel I'm actually pretty moderate on that as I believe there are
>>> examples of women having church positions (such as Phoebe the Deaconess
>>> mentioned at the end of Romans e.g.).  I was just using that Corinthian
>>> directive as an example.
>>>
>>> To answer your question.  I see I phrased my conclusion poorly.  I
>>> don't think it's an if-than type issue.  i.e. if we remove our hat during
>>> the national anthem; than we should also remove out hat in church.
>>> Although, that may be one way to try and present it to a young person who
>>> was struggling with the "why?" of the issue.  That said, yes I was brought
>>> up that way.  I wouldn't say it was explained to me but rather I followed
>>> the lead of other male figures in my life and was gently chastised by people
>>> I respected when I didn't comply through my own forgetfulness vice any sort
>>> of rebellion.  The issue was further cemented when I joined the military.
>>> Disdain seems a strong word but if I honestly reflect on it, it may be
>>> accurate.  I admit I do notice it and privately don't approve.  I wouldn't
>>> let my own children wear a hat to church and I suppose if I were in any kind
>>> of mentoring role to other young males I would try and gently steer them in
>>> that direction as well.  I don't see a problem with a do-rag on the skate
>>> park or even in the church lobby but it doesn't sit right with me to see it
>>> in the church sanctuary during worship and prayer times.  But that's just
>>> me, and I wouldn't presume to judge.  That is to say, I can separate the
>>> cultural issue from the spiritual one.
>>>  A follow on question to you guys would be: which do you think is more
>>> acceptable; asking someone to remove their hat during the national
>>> anthem or asking them to remove it before we pray?
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: [crosspointe-discuss] Re: The Baseball Cap Wars...
>>> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:28:06 -0500
>>>
>>> Rob,
>>> We just did a podcast on the role of women in the Church.  You should
>>> listen to it if you get a chance.
>>> http://www.sermonconnect.com/search_result.php?keyword=mike+butler&searchtype=general&searchby=speaker&Find=Find
>>>
>>> I really wanted to discuss the significance of the "head covering" in
>>> worship, but I wasn't sure it was necessary in the context of the post. I
>>> may not have been entirely clear on my opinion regarding the Corinthian
>>> Church.  I believe that what Paul wrote to that Church was significant then
>>> and is still significant to us today, just for different reasons.   I think
>>> the other necessary component to properly interpreting these passages, have
>>> to do with their association with other passages from Paul specifically.
>>>  Paul doesn't seem to address the concept of "orderly worship" for other
>>> Churches in such an intense way.  Given the intensity of the discussion for
>>> Corinth, if it had been such a serious concern, I would think it would have
>>> shown up in something like the Letter to the Romans which spends a great
>>> deal of time on theology.  Lastly, it just appears that Paul had more to say
>>> to the Corinthians about seemingly "remedial" practices in the Church, that
>>> didn't need further instruction with the other Churches.  That being said,
>>> the silence of the subject actually impairs our ability to understand the
>>> full force of his commands.
>>> Just out of curiosity, due to its apparent disrespect,  is it
>>> possible-theoretically- that your disdain for people leaving their hats on
>>> during the National Anthem somewhat fuels your disdain for people wearing
>>> hats during service? (or vice versa)
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Oct 21, 2008, at 12:01 PM, Robert Long wrote:
>>>
>>>  You have tattoos?  I'm afraid I'm going to have to look for a new
>>> discussion group... lol!
>>>
>>> I really liked the point about the importance of the church building.  We
>>> all know that the church is the people but I think we would also agree (I
>>> think... I know I would anyway) that parts of the Church building itself are
>>> more holy and sacred.  This is at an odd juxtaposition with the Overdrive
>>> service I attend - I don't consider the Overdrive facilities particularly
>>> "holy" per se but I would consider the main curch sanctuary as "holy".  If a
>>> church service is held at that location isn't it holy?  Is is only holy
>>> during church?  this brings up all kinds of questions (Should I not wear a
>>> hat around people I go to church with?  their the church after all,
>>> right?).  I'm going to have to ponder the origins of my thought processes
>>> here.
>>>
>>> On topic though.  Thanks for the insight fella's.  I also came to the
>>> conclusion that the hat doffing was more cultural than spiritual.  I was
>>> hoping you all would read 1 Corinthians 11 and see that it is a little
>>> presumptuous to just take that passage and say hey! - we shouldn't wear hats
>>> in church.  There's more going on there, as Mike suggested, and even more
>>> than Mike suggested when you start looking at the issue of headship and what
>>> exactly Paul is referring to - he seems to have a double meaning going.  Not
>>> sure I'm comfortable just dismissing the entirety of the Corinthian letters
>>> as only for a specific church because there is some very good stuff in
>>> there.  However, there is considerable support that Paul is addressing
>>> specific topics in this specific church rather than outlining how all
>>> churches should be.  Don't want to get too sidetracked as I have a point I
>>> want to make - but, in the first letter Paul states woman should be silent
>>> in church while in other places in the NT woman are clearly a part of
>>> worship services.  This contradiction can be resolved by saying there were
>>> specific women in the Corinthian church who were a problem.  Other aspects,
>>> such as the head covering section, have no contradiction (that I'm aware
>>> of) so are they just for Corinth or for all of us?  Well anyway, there are
>>> clearly different ways to run specific churches based on the local culture
>>> or needs - this is seen in scripture  This is interesting when you look at
>>> the negative light the splintered church is viewed in.  Isn't it possible
>>> that God knew different worship styles would appeal to different types of
>>> people and there is no one specific way church is meant to be run.  I think
>>> the answer is yes.
>>> Back to hats for a sec.  Once I decided the hat doffing phenomenon was
>>> cultural I started to look into the roots of this practice.  Some people say
>>> it is a sign of respect that developed during medieval times when knights
>>> raised their visor so there friends could see their face.  I have seen it
>>> noted that it is common Jewish practice to cover one's head when praying
>>> vice uncovering.  I also saw it noted that outside of the U.S. no one really
>>> cares about your hat.  Ms. Manners tells me its just proper etiquette.
>>> However, some people do think it is rooted in 1 Cor. 11.  One of the points
>>> I made in class (and I big one I want to make here) relates back to why do
>>> people blame Christians for things we have nothing to do with.  One of the
>>> big complaints I see as I putter around message boards and skeptic sites is
>>> that people have a problem with inconsistencies in the observance of the
>>> Christian faith.  I already talked about different worship methods above.
>>> Additionally, I think people fail to see that to become a Christian is not
>>> to just to suddenly snap to conformance of some supposed norm.  e.g. a new
>>> Christian may have no problem wearing their hat to church but as they mature
>>> they may, depending on how they develop in Christ.  The church is made up of
>>> hat wearers and non-hat wearers and this is ok to us but puzzling from the
>>> outside.
>>> Personally, I don't like seeing all the kids running around with hats on
>>> during church but I do like seeing them in church which is clearly more
>>> important.  I would hope they are being taught that if they know to take
>>> their hat off during the national anthem (and hopefully they do, but that's
>>> a whole 'nother topic to be sure) its a no-brainer that we take our hat off
>>> when we're worshiping God.  As they mature in Christ I suspect many of them
>>> will come to this conclusion on their own without a heavy-handed approach.
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>>
>>>  some people feel it is rooted in 1 Cor. 11.
>>> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > To: [email protected]
>>> > Subject: [crosspointe-discuss] Re: The Baseball Cap Wars...
>>> > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:13:47 -0500
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Rob,
>>> > i just finished reading the article. I can certainly appreciate the
>>> > difficulty that the pastor faced in dealing with the problem. I am
>>> > confident that the real problem was more cultural than it was
>>> > "spiritual", which may prove to be the same in some settings. This
>>> > type of problem surfaces in churches everywhere, just under a
>>> > different description. Perhaps, it is suits and ties as opposed to
>>> > pants and t-shirt. I know that a great number of people disregard my
>>> > opinion on matters due to the fact that I have tattoos or because I
>>> > have a gotee. Often people consider my thoughts to be of little
>>> > consequence due to the fact that I am a "pastor" and what do I really
>>> > know about living life outside of the Church walls. There was only
>>> > one point in the article when it was suggested that it was ".. a sign
>>> > of submission to a higher authority" to remove a person's hat inside
>>> > of the Church building or during prayer at a Graveside Service. It
>>> > seemed to me that wearing the hats had less to do with a "spiritual
>>> > position" and more to do with rebellion. No question that the
>>> > rebellion ultimately was against God and his call for all believers to
>>>
>>> > consider the needs of the fellowship as a whole, but that was not
>>> > really conveyed by the Pastor to the family. I have found it
>>> > interesting that such a great deal of emphasis has been placed on the
>>> > "proper things to do in the church building", not necessarily within
>>> > this post, but in general. As if the building truly represented the
>>> > body of Christ as a whole. Paul makes such a strong argument for the
>>> > believer to be identified as the "temple" of God in opposition to a
>>> > building. If everything we do outside of the building is contrary to
>>> > the Law of the Spirit, does it matter if we honor the "rules" inside
>>> > of the building?
>>> > On Oct 20, 2008, at 10:04 AM, Rob L. wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > > In discussing James 4:12 last week I was trying to make a point that
>>> > > if we don't obey a law because we think it is silly we are judging
>>> > > that law. I initially used some driving laws to make my point (a
>>> > > speed limit set to low e.g.) but turned to biblical laws. First let
>>> > > me say that I don't think any of God's laws are silly and believe He
>>> > > has a reason for whatever directives He has set - I was trying to
>>> stir
>>> > > up some conversation about why we dismiss some scripture and obey
>>> > > other parts - i.e. are we guilty of judging the law.... I threw out a
>>> > > comment about a friend of all of ours wearing a "do-rag" in church
>>> and
>>> > > how as an old-school type church person I didn't particularly care
>>> for
>>> > > it; but I acknowledged it seemed like a silly thing to make an issue
>>> > > of even though I know there is some scriptural support for my
>>> > > opinion. WELL!! let me tell you, this opened a can of worms about
>>> > > reaching out to people, and not judging, and freedom in Christ, and
>>> > > all manner of objection and I ended up talking myself into a corner.
>>> > > If you don't know I'm referring to Jim Joyce, and I have related to
>>> > > Jim that he was the object of our discussion and it was as a learning
>>> > > point rather than a protest or complaint. I don't want to come across
>>> > > as gossiping behind Jim's back or anything. The objections were
>>> > > specifically that Jim is reaching out to skaters in the community as
>>> > > part as his ministry to youth and if dressing like them helps them
>>> > > feel more comfortable in a church environment and ultimately brings
>>> > > young people to Christ then who am I to get all "pharisee" on him.
>>> > > It troubled me enough to come back to the issue yesterday and
>>> actually
>>> > > we spent the whole class discussing this linked article -
>>> > > http://www.ctlibrary.com/le/1998/spring/8l2054.html
>>> > > It kind of reminded me of the whole "dancing" issue so I thought you
>>> > > guys might find it interesting. In reading it I would encourage you
>>> > > to see the baseball caps as a metaphor for whatever postmodern
>>> > > behavior you think is relevant. Some scripture we referenced included
>>> > > 1 Corinthians 8 and 1 Corinthians 11. I have more to add regarding my
>>> > > own opinions but as always I'd like to see you'alls thoughts before I
>>> > > inject my own bias (anymore than I already have...)
>>> > >
>>> > > Rob
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   Mike Butler, Minister to College and Singles CrossPointe Church
>>> Happy are the Beggars
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >>>
>>>
>>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Crosspointe Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/crosspointe-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to