I highly doubt it'd be that high, they link it based on SteamID for a reason (so they check whichever server from the owner's steamid gets the most reports), and they'd only check the top reported servers. DO you have something to hide? You seem to be really against this.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Ejziponken - <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm guessing it wont be only a handful of servers getting raid reported.. > What if its a 100 servers everyday? :P > > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:28:45 -0400 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Csgo_servers] Notice of changes to CS:GO Game Server > Operation > > It takes five minutes tops to investigate a server. If they've taken the > effort to implement this system it means they care. Allot a 20 minute time > slot daily which rotates and someone on the csgo team checks the top > reports. > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Ejziponken - <[email protected]> wrote: > > BTW, BIG no for a report system. I simply don't trust any system that > would have any kind of automation in it. I don't really see anyone from > Valve investigating all the servers that gets X reports. People would raid > report legit servers and they would probably get banned from time to time > because someone makes a mistake or is to lazy to investigate it. > > ------------------------------ > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 01:23:28 +0200 > > Subject: Re: [Csgo_servers] Notice of changes to CS:GO Game Server > Operation > > Yeah, I removed our plugins as soon Vitality posted about it but I left > the "knife" tag and got banned anyway... > > > To: [email protected] > > From: [email protected] > > Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:55:44 +0200 > > Subject: Re: [Csgo_servers] Notice of changes to CS:GO Game Server > Operation > > > > Yes, > > the previous system was banning ip blocks, so most of the banned servers > > were wrongfully banned. Also, the bans were based on sv_tags only, where > > a server could have been 100% legit with wrong tags, they would be > banned. > > VAC is a completely different system which i won't even start talking > about. > > > > BR, > > Niko > > > > PS: @Michael, please let's try not to argue but talk constructively. You > > have a point there, I agree, but the problem sounds worse than what it > > actually is. > > > > > > On 10/16/2015 00:48, Daniel Barreiro wrote: > > > I have no experience personally with it, but has there ever been any > > > actual proof of servers being wrongly banned? If there is then yeah > > > it's an issue, but I haven't had any issues with it and generally > > > every time someone claims to have been wrongfully banned, they don't > > > provide proof and just hope it will get them unbanned. Same as with > > > VAC. 99% of the time the I WAS WRONGFULLY BANNED is bullshit. > > > > > > If there's a good example of a true wrongful ban then yeah it's an > > > issue, but I don't know of any. Got any links? > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Csgo_servers mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers > > _______________________________________________ Csgo_servers mailing list > [email protected] > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers > > _______________________________________________ > Csgo_servers mailing list > [email protected] > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers > > > > _______________________________________________ Csgo_servers mailing list > [email protected] > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers > > _______________________________________________ > Csgo_servers mailing list > [email protected] > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers >
_______________________________________________ Csgo_servers mailing list [email protected] https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers
