Tom Livingston wrote:
> Looking through the validator output, i'd *guess* that the errors were things > that the "...experimental feature: HTML5 Conformance > Checker" doesn't understand, such as vendor prefixes etc. In its HTML 5 mode, the validator is indeed an imperfect tool, but in general it is fairly safe to assume that a document that fails validation is far more likely to be invalid than the validator is likely to be in error. In the specific case you cite (vendor prefixes) it is my understanding that these are non-standard (i.e., not in the specification) and therefore the error message is correct. Philip Taylor ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
