On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Philip TAYLOR <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Tom Livingston wrote: > > > Looking through the validator output, i'd *guess* that the errors were > things that the "...experimental feature: HTML5 Conformance > > Checker" doesn't understand, such as vendor prefixes etc. > > [snip] > In the specific case you cite (vendor > prefixes) it is my understanding that these are non-standard (i.e., > not in the specification) and therefore the error message is correct. My point exactly. It's throwing an error, but for something that the validator just doesn't understand and flags but is considered by most to be "OK" to have in the styles. Unless you are in the camp of "no vendor prefixes ever" and the like... -- Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [[email protected]] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
